Skip to content
Sponsored

Why Is St. Louis Using Tax Money to Subsidize Parking Lots and Bars?

Tax increment financing is a pretty neat tool cities can use to finance quality-of-life amenities, like the Beltline in Atlanta, or the streetcar in Kansas City, by capturing the taxes from the property value increases of the investments.
Sponsored
St. Louis’ subsidized “Ballpark Village” looks suspiciously like a giant parking lot. But the Cardinals say it’s only until the market proves it can sustain the original mixed-use plan. Image: Riverfront Times

Tax increment financing is a pretty neat tool cities can use to finance quality-of-life amenities, like the Beltline in Atlanta, or the streetcar in Kansas City, by capturing the taxes from the property value increases of the investments.

“Ballpark Village” was originally envisioned as a mixed-use neighborhood. Image: Riverfront Times. Click to enlarge.

On the other hand, there’s a new model being pioneered by St. Louis, where you use special financing to subsidize the construction of parking lots and bars. That’s the plan for “Ballpark Village,” a once-soaring vision for a mixed-use neighborhood by the Cardinals’ stadium in downtown St. Louis. But then came the housing crisis, and following revision after revision, that plan has morphed into little more than a giant field of asphalt. The plan now includes 400 parking spaces and a single building that will house the “Cardinals Hall of Fame Museum” and a restaurant.

But St. Louis is still on the hook for special tax revenues to be delivered right back to developers. Alderman Scott Ogilvie told the Riverfront Times the city is getting hosed.

“Every time they sell a beer at these bars, they are keeping most of that tax revenue to pay for the construction,” he said. “You have to be smart about what you’re subsidizing.”

“It’s not like we’re desperate for places to drink in St. Louis so we have to subsidize it and create more,” said Ogilvie. “What improves downtown, what makes downtown great is more housing options and quality jobs. The housing component has been completely stripped out.”

Ron Watermon, a spokesman for the St. Louis Cardinals — the land owner — defended the plans, saying the parking-heavy proposal was just a holding strategy till they could pursue the grander vision for a “really vibrant neighborhood.” He added that it would need to be “market driven.” The Cardinals are contracting with private developer Cordish Companies on the project.

“It’s always good to have additional parking downtown,” he said.

Unless, of course, you actually live downtown and have to look at it. Readers at Next STL joked the development should be called “CarPark Village.”

Photo of Angie Schmitt
Angie is a Cleveland-based writer with a background in planning and newspaper reporting. She has been writing about cities for Streetsblog for six years.

Read More:

Sponsored

Support Streetsblog

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: The H.A.R.D. Fight Against Hit-and-Runs

December 12, 2025

Wednesday’ Headlines Are on Autopilot

December 10, 2025

City Shuts Down Volunteer Crosswalk Painting Event in Los Angeles

December 9, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Set the Record Straight

December 9, 2025
See all posts