Skip to content
Sponsored

Mmmm, This ‘Pork’ Sounds Tasty: Senators Serve Up Transit Aid

One of Washington's most enduring truisms is that "pork" is in the eye of the beholder. Self-styled anti-earmark crusaders are fond of bashing clean transportation projects as improper uses of taxpayer money, but most of them recognize privately that rail, bus, and bike investments are a good thing.
Sponsored

One of Washington’s most enduring truisms is that “pork” is in the eye of the beholder. Self-styled anti-earmark crusaders are fond of bashing clean transportation projects as improper uses of taxpayer money, but most of them recognize privately that rail, bus, and bike investments are a good thing.

090108_bond_raju.jpgHe may not like to admit it, but Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO) believes in supporting transit. (Photo: Politico)

A perfect example of this principle at work can be found in the Senate’s transportation spending bill for 2010.

The fiscally hawkish Citizens Against Government Waste blasted the bill today for containing 47 percent more “pork” than its counterpart last year — but the group also managed to catch several conservatives showing their pro-transit stripes.

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-TX), who has sought to remove her state entirely from the national road-funding system, got $150 million for two Houston light rail projects. Utah’s two GOP senators, Orrin Hatch and Robert Bennett, snagged $180 million for two rail projects in their state.

Even staunch highway backers such as Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and Sen. Richard Shelby (R-AL) got into the spirit. McConnell won $1 million for bus service at Western Kentucky University, while Shelby secured $2 million for buses for senior citizens across his state.

But the most surprising fan of clean transport “pork” is Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO), a staunch ally of the highway lobby who declared earlier this year that investing in carbon-reducing modes of travel is “not stimulative” to the economy. Turns out Bond got money for quite a few “not stimulative” projects …

  • $1.15 million for a new bus transfer center
  • $2 million for new fuel-efficient buses in Kansas City
  • $1.6 million for the Cape Girardeau Riverwalk Trail
  • $2 million for new bus facilities statewide
  • $1 million for new transit vehicles in Columbia, MO

Such numbers pale in comparison with the funds Bond has lavished on new roads over the course of his career. Still, next time the senator seeks to kill transportation reform such as the “complete streets” bill, his constituents can now remind him that he too enjoys some bites of healthy “pork.”

Sponsored

Support Streetsblog

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: The H.A.R.D. Fight Against Hit-and-Runs

December 12, 2025

Wednesday’ Headlines Are on Autopilot

December 10, 2025

City Shuts Down Volunteer Crosswalk Painting Event in Los Angeles

December 9, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Set the Record Straight

December 9, 2025
See all posts