Skip to content
Sponsored

Tracking Transport Subsidies: As Tough as Following the Stimulus Money

The $787 billion economic stimulus effort was intended to be a model of government transparency -- but a privately run website called Recovery.org soon began beating out the government in the race to trace federal dollars. Now, as the Pew Charitable Trusts begins to expand its Subsidyscope fiscal monitoring project, some similar gaps in spending data are emerging.
Sponsored

The $787 billion economic stimulus effort was intended to be a model of government transparency — but a privately run website called Recovery.org soon began beating out the government in the race to trace federal dollars. Now, as the Pew Charitable Trusts begins to expand its Subsidyscope fiscal monitoring project, some similar gaps in spending data are emerging.

A joint project of Pew and the nonprofit Sunlight Foundation, Subsidyscope began its work with the financial bailout and plans to release a map of the government’s transportation studies by this fall.

But as the site’s researchers noted in a recent release, some major pieces of the puzzle are missing from USASpending.gov, the online federal-finances monitor created in 2006 by legislation with a notable champion: then-Sen. Barack Obama:

A link to a discussion of “Data Quality” is displayed prominently on
every page of the site, but the actual mechanism by which
USASpending.gov tracks data quality seems woefully inadequate. The site
appears to simply measure the completeness of each record that is
reported to it. Identifying missing parts of a record is useful, but it
does nothing to identify when whole records are missing. … Currently there is no means by which USASpending.gov can
ensure that it is receiving all of the records it should be.

Two sizable pieces of the nation’s transport industry were altered in government spending records, Subsidyscope found — Amtrak’s 2008 budget was mysteriously halved, and the entire budget for the Merchant Marine Academy was missing.

Those discrepancies represent more than just a failure to comply with the spirit of Obama’s 2006 transparency law; they also underscore the daunting task of attempting to reform transportation policy in an age of mammoth imbalance between federal support for highways and transit, as well as an ingrained resistance to changing existing patterns of infrastructure investment.

The government’s thicket of counterproductive agriculture subsidies has been well-mapped by groups on the right and the left, and Congress has still resisted any attempt to trim the system. Given Subsidyscope researchers’ difficulty in getting their arms around transportation spending data, cutting subsidies in that sector is likely to be even more challenging.

Sponsored

Support Streetsblog

Comments Are Temporarily Disabled

Streetsblog is in the process of migrating our commenting system. During this transition, commenting is temporarily unavailable.

Once the migration is complete, you will be able to log back in and will have full access to your comment history. We appreciate your patience and look forward to having you back in the conversation soon.

More from Streetsblog USA

Friday Video: The H.A.R.D. Fight Against Hit-and-Runs

December 12, 2025

Wednesday’ Headlines Are on Autopilot

December 10, 2025

City Shuts Down Volunteer Crosswalk Painting Event in Los Angeles

December 9, 2025

Tuesday’s Headlines Set the Record Straight

December 9, 2025
See all posts